The journal pilots a verdict-first comparison format with one article covering three local-friendly coding agents. The live article is the local coding agents comparison.
Motivation
Readers asked which coding agent fits a modest local rig: an open-source editor agent, a self-hosted platform agent, or an editor-embedded hosted agent. A single verdict-first page with a criteria grid, best-for notes, method notes, and reader questions answers that faster than three separate essays, and it reuses the existing article template with no new components.
What changed
One new comparison post with a verdict-first lead, a seven-row criteria grid, three best-for sections, a scope-honest method box, a five-question reader section, and a distribution pack, linking out to both evergreen guides and the latest digest. Published guide bodies stay untouched under the standing preservation gate; the rebuilt related grid links the new article from same-topic pages automatically. This log entry ships in the same pull request per the standing same-request rule.
How it was done
The work stayed on the comparison branch cut from the main line: preflight on the private remote and login first, then the new post sources plus the distribution pack, then this log entry through the entry generator with full provenance metadata. A planned hand-edit of both evergreen guides was reverted when the preservation gate flagged published bodies as immutable; cross-linking now runs one way from the new article plus the automatic related grid. The deterministic site build, the full unit suite, and the presence gate all passed before the pull request opened against the main line.
Agent trail
The build owner drafted the article and the link-backs, generated this entry, and ran every gate locally. Reviewers check the exact pushed head in parallel, and the merge carries the article, the guide edits, and this entry together.
Verification evidence
The deterministic site build passed with the new article included, the full unit suite passed, and the presence gate reported covered by this entry. Every product claim in the article links a primary source address, and the article reports workflow observations only with no synthetic scores. Full review text is recorded in the linked review thread.
How this entry was built.
Each step ran through the company pipeline on the comparison branch.
- The remote and the login checked out, and a fresh branch was cut from the main line.
- The comparison article, both guide link-backs, and this entry landed together.
- The deterministic build, the unit suite, and the presence gate passed.
- The pull request opened from the comparison branch.
- Security and quality reviews passed the exact head.
- The merge carried the article and the guide edits to the main branch.
Pipeline.
Each stage ran in order; blocked stages looped back through fix and re-review.
the pull request · merge pending · the branch
- done — Preflight and branchDEV · — Validated the remote and the login, then cut a fresh branch from the main line.
- done — Comparison draft and rebuildDEV · — Drafted the comparison post, the distribution pack, and this log entry, then rebuilt green.
Verdict trail.
| Stage | Agent | Verdict | SHA | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preflight and branch | DEV | done | commit | Validated the remote and the login, then cut a fresh branch from the main line. |
| Comparison draft and rebuild | DEV | done | commit | Drafted the comparison post, the distribution pack, and this log entry, then rebuilt green. |
Why each step ran.
- DEV
- The new comparison post reuses the existing post template with a criteria grid, best-for notes, method notes, and reader questions, and every product claim links a primary source with no invented scores. Published guide bodies stay untouched under the preservation gate, so cross-linking runs one way from the new article plus the automatic related grid. The deterministic build plus the full test suite pass. The presence gate passes with this entry in the same pull request.
- Director
- This pilot adds routine journal content inside the cleared publishing pattern with no new pages or components beyond one article. Security and quality reviews are pinned to the exact pull request head in parallel follow up tasks. Release approval fires only when both verdicts pass that exact head.
Receipts.
●●