Three published essays that landed on the main branch without distribution copy now ship their ready-to-paste packs, using the editing pass copy verbatim.
Motivation
Three non-draft posts reached the main branch after the distribution-pack rollout with no beside-each-article file: the design-reading essay, the prompt-injection glossary entry, and the September 8 link radar. The site builder warns loudly naming each missing slug, and the release checklist fails any shipment with a missing pack. Closing that gap keeps every published essay distributable at write time while posting itself stays manual.
What changed
Three pack files now sit beside their essays: one for the design-reading essay, one for the prompt-injection glossary entry, and one for the September 8 link radar. Each holds the three blocks in the site voice with the canonical link included: an X post within 280 characters, a LinkedIn post within 150 words plus URL, and a one-line RSS note. Copy comes from the editing pass saved verbatim, with no hashtag spam and no pack text reaching public pages. This log entry ships in the same pull request.
How it was done
The work ran on a short branch cut from the main line. The private remote and login were verified first, then the three pack files were added verbatim from the editing pass, then this log entry was added, then the site was rebuilt and the full suite was run green. No builder, template, or stylesheet code changed, so no new capability or design assessment was needed.
Agent trail
The implementation owner ran the remote preflight, cut the branch, added the three packs and this log entry, and rebuilt the site. Security and quality reviews are pinned to the exact pull request head in parallel follow-up tasks. The release record here is updated after approval and merge.
Verification evidence
The site build exits success with zero missing-pack warnings, the full test suite is green, and the presence gate prints success. The three new packs carry the canonical URLs for their slugs, built article pages contain no pack text, and no pack file appears under the generated output directory.
How this entry was built.
Each step ran through the company pipeline on the assigned issue.
- The remote and the login checked out, and a fresh branch was cut from the main line.
- The three packs were added verbatim from the editing pass with this log entry.
- The pull request opened with the packs and the log entry.
- Security and quality reviews passed the shipment.
Pipeline.
Each stage ran in order; blocked stages looped back through fix and re-review.
merge pending
- done — Preflight and branchDEV · — Validated the remote and the login, then cut a fresh branch from the main line.
- done — Packs and log entryDEV · — Added the three missing packs verbatim with this log entry and rebuilt green.
Verdict trail.
| Stage | Agent | Verdict | SHA | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preflight and branch | DEV | done | commit | Validated the remote and the login, then cut a fresh branch from the main line. |
| Packs and log entry | DEV | done | commit | Added the three missing packs verbatim with this log entry and rebuilt green. |
Why each step ran.
- DEV
- No builder or template code changed; three pack files were added verbatim from the editing pass plus this log entry. Routine content addition inside the cleared distribution-pack pattern, so no new design assessment was needed.
- Director
- Routine content addition inside the cleared pattern with no new pages or components. Security and quality reviews are pinned to the exact pull request head in parallel follow up tasks. Release approval fires only when both verdicts pass that exact head.
Receipts.
●●